alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | package org.onlab.onos.of.controller.impl.internal; |
| 2 | |
| 3 | import java.io.IOException; |
| 4 | import java.util.Collections; |
alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 5 | |
| 6 | import org.onlab.onos.of.controller.RoleState; |
| 7 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFControllerRole; |
| 8 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFErrorMsg; |
| 9 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFErrorType; |
| 10 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFExperimenter; |
| 11 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFFactories; |
| 12 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFMessage; |
| 13 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFNiciraControllerRole; |
| 14 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFNiciraControllerRoleReply; |
| 15 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFRoleReply; |
| 16 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFRoleRequest; |
| 17 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFVersion; |
| 18 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.errormsg.OFBadRequestErrorMsg; |
| 19 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.errormsg.OFRoleRequestFailedErrorMsg; |
| 20 | import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.types.U64; |
| 21 | import org.slf4j.Logger; |
| 22 | import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | /** |
| 26 | * A utility class to handle role requests and replies for this channel. |
| 27 | * After a role request is submitted the role changer keeps track of the |
| 28 | * pending request, collects the reply (if any) and times out the request |
| 29 | * if necessary. |
| 30 | * |
| 31 | * To simplify role handling we only keep track of the /last/ pending |
| 32 | * role reply send to the switch. If multiple requests are pending and |
| 33 | * we receive replies for earlier requests we ignore them. However, this |
| 34 | * way of handling pending requests implies that we could wait forever if |
| 35 | * a new request is submitted before the timeout triggers. If necessary |
| 36 | * we could work around that though. |
| 37 | */ |
| 38 | class RoleManager { |
| 39 | protected static final long NICIRA_EXPERIMENTER = 0x2320; |
| 40 | |
| 41 | private static Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(RoleManager.class); |
| 42 | // indicates that a request is currently pending |
| 43 | // needs to be volatile to allow correct double-check idiom |
| 44 | private volatile boolean requestPending; |
| 45 | // the transaction Id of the pending request |
| 46 | private int pendingXid; |
| 47 | // the role that's pending |
| 48 | private RoleState pendingRole; |
| 49 | |
| 50 | // the expectation set by the caller for the returned role |
| 51 | private RoleRecvStatus expectation; |
alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | private AbstractOpenFlowSwitch sw; |
| 53 | |
| 54 | |
| 55 | public RoleManager(AbstractOpenFlowSwitch sw) { |
| 56 | this.requestPending = false; |
| 57 | this.pendingXid = -1; |
| 58 | this.pendingRole = null; |
alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 59 | this.expectation = RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE; |
| 60 | this.sw = sw; |
| 61 | } |
| 62 | |
| 63 | /** |
| 64 | * Send NX role request message to the switch requesting the specified |
| 65 | * role. |
| 66 | * |
| 67 | * @param sw switch to send the role request message to |
| 68 | * @param role role to request |
| 69 | */ |
| 70 | private int sendNxRoleRequest(RoleState role) throws IOException { |
| 71 | // Convert the role enum to the appropriate role to send |
| 72 | OFNiciraControllerRole roleToSend = OFNiciraControllerRole.ROLE_OTHER; |
| 73 | switch (role) { |
| 74 | case MASTER: |
| 75 | roleToSend = OFNiciraControllerRole.ROLE_MASTER; |
| 76 | break; |
| 77 | case SLAVE: |
| 78 | case EQUAL: |
| 79 | default: |
| 80 | // ensuring that the only two roles sent to 1.0 switches with |
| 81 | // Nicira role support, are MASTER and SLAVE |
| 82 | roleToSend = OFNiciraControllerRole.ROLE_SLAVE; |
| 83 | log.warn("Sending Nx Role.SLAVE to switch {}.", sw); |
| 84 | } |
alshabib | d777b20 | 2014-08-28 17:52:55 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 85 | int xid = sw.getNextTransactionId(); |
alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 86 | OFExperimenter roleRequest = OFFactories.getFactory(OFVersion.OF_10) |
| 87 | .buildNiciraControllerRoleRequest() |
| 88 | .setXid(xid) |
| 89 | .setRole(roleToSend) |
| 90 | .build(); |
| 91 | sw.write(Collections.<OFMessage>singletonList(roleRequest)); |
| 92 | return xid; |
| 93 | } |
| 94 | |
| 95 | private int sendOF13RoleRequest(RoleState role) throws IOException { |
| 96 | // Convert the role enum to the appropriate role to send |
| 97 | OFControllerRole roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_NOCHANGE; |
| 98 | switch (role) { |
| 99 | case EQUAL: |
| 100 | roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_EQUAL; |
| 101 | break; |
| 102 | case MASTER: |
| 103 | roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_MASTER; |
| 104 | break; |
| 105 | case SLAVE: |
| 106 | roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_SLAVE; |
| 107 | break; |
| 108 | default: |
| 109 | log.warn("Sending default role.noChange to switch {}." |
| 110 | + " Should only be used for queries.", sw); |
| 111 | } |
| 112 | |
alshabib | d777b20 | 2014-08-28 17:52:55 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 113 | int xid = sw.getNextTransactionId(); |
alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 114 | OFRoleRequest rrm = OFFactories.getFactory(OFVersion.OF_13) |
| 115 | .buildRoleRequest() |
| 116 | .setRole(roleToSend) |
| 117 | .setXid(xid) |
| 118 | //FIXME fix below when we actually use generation ids |
| 119 | .setGenerationId(U64.ZERO) |
| 120 | .build(); |
alshabib | d777b20 | 2014-08-28 17:52:55 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 121 | sw.sendMsg(rrm); |
alshabib | 54ebd9c | 2014-08-27 18:38:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 122 | return xid; |
| 123 | } |
| 124 | |
| 125 | /** |
| 126 | * Send a role request with the given role to the switch and update |
| 127 | * the pending request and timestamp. |
| 128 | * Sends an OFPT_ROLE_REQUEST to an OF1.3 switch, OR |
| 129 | * Sends an NX_ROLE_REQUEST to an OF1.0 switch if configured to support it |
| 130 | * in the IOFSwitch driver. If not supported, this method sends nothing |
| 131 | * and returns 'false'. The caller should take appropriate action. |
| 132 | * |
| 133 | * One other optimization we do here is that for OF1.0 switches with |
| 134 | * Nicira role message support, we force the Role.EQUAL to become |
| 135 | * Role.SLAVE, as there is no defined behavior for the Nicira role OTHER. |
| 136 | * We cannot expect it to behave like SLAVE. We don't have this problem with |
| 137 | * OF1.3 switches, because Role.EQUAL is well defined and we can simulate |
| 138 | * SLAVE behavior by using ASYNC messages. |
| 139 | * |
| 140 | * @param role |
| 141 | * @throws IOException |
| 142 | * @returns false if and only if the switch does not support role-request |
| 143 | * messages, according to the switch driver; true otherwise. |
| 144 | */ |
| 145 | synchronized boolean sendRoleRequest(RoleState role, RoleRecvStatus exp) |
| 146 | throws IOException { |
| 147 | this.expectation = exp; |
| 148 | |
| 149 | if (sw.factory().getVersion() == OFVersion.OF_10) { |
| 150 | Boolean supportsNxRole = (Boolean) |
| 151 | sw.supportNxRole(); |
| 152 | if (!supportsNxRole) { |
| 153 | log.debug("Switch driver indicates no support for Nicira " |
| 154 | + "role request messages. Not sending ..."); |
| 155 | handleUnsentRoleMessage(role, |
| 156 | expectation); |
| 157 | return false; |
| 158 | } |
| 159 | // OF1.0 switch with support for NX_ROLE_REQUEST vendor extn. |
| 160 | // make Role.EQUAL become Role.SLAVE |
| 161 | role = (role == RoleState.EQUAL) ? RoleState.SLAVE : role; |
| 162 | pendingXid = sendNxRoleRequest(role); |
| 163 | pendingRole = role; |
| 164 | requestPending = true; |
| 165 | } else { |
| 166 | // OF1.3 switch, use OFPT_ROLE_REQUEST message |
| 167 | pendingXid = sendOF13RoleRequest(role); |
| 168 | pendingRole = role; |
| 169 | requestPending = true; |
| 170 | } |
| 171 | return true; |
| 172 | } |
| 173 | |
| 174 | private void handleUnsentRoleMessage(RoleState role, |
| 175 | RoleRecvStatus exp) throws IOException { |
| 176 | // typically this is triggered for a switch where role messages |
| 177 | // are not supported - we confirm that the role being set is |
| 178 | // master |
| 179 | if (exp != RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 180 | |
| 181 | log.error("Expected MASTER role from registry for switch " |
| 182 | + "which has no support for role-messages." |
| 183 | + "Received {}. It is possible that this switch " |
| 184 | + "is connected to other controllers, in which " |
| 185 | + "case it should support role messages - not " |
| 186 | + "moving forward.", role); |
| 187 | |
| 188 | } |
| 189 | |
| 190 | } |
| 191 | |
| 192 | /** |
| 193 | * Deliver a received role reply. |
| 194 | * |
| 195 | * Check if a request is pending and if the received reply matches the |
| 196 | * the expected pending reply (we check both role and xid) we set |
| 197 | * the role for the switch/channel. |
| 198 | * |
| 199 | * If a request is pending but doesn't match the reply we ignore it, and |
| 200 | * return |
| 201 | * |
| 202 | * If no request is pending we disconnect with a SwitchStateException |
| 203 | * |
| 204 | * @param RoleReplyInfo information about role-reply in format that |
| 205 | * controller can understand. |
| 206 | * @throws SwitchStateException if no request is pending |
| 207 | */ |
| 208 | synchronized RoleRecvStatus deliverRoleReply(RoleReplyInfo rri) |
| 209 | throws SwitchStateException { |
| 210 | if (!requestPending) { |
| 211 | RoleState currentRole = (sw != null) ? sw.getRole() : null; |
| 212 | if (currentRole != null) { |
| 213 | if (currentRole == rri.getRole()) { |
| 214 | // Don't disconnect if the role reply we received is |
| 215 | // for the same role we are already in. |
| 216 | log.debug("Received unexpected RoleReply from " |
| 217 | + "Switch: {}. " |
| 218 | + "Role in reply is same as current role of this " |
| 219 | + "controller for this sw. Ignoring ...", |
| 220 | sw.getStringId()); |
| 221 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 222 | } else { |
| 223 | String msg = String.format("Switch: [%s], " |
| 224 | + "received unexpected RoleReply[%s]. " |
| 225 | + "No roles are pending, and this controller's " |
| 226 | + "current role:[%s] does not match reply. " |
| 227 | + "Disconnecting switch ... ", |
| 228 | sw.getStringId(), |
| 229 | rri, currentRole); |
| 230 | throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| 231 | } |
| 232 | } |
| 233 | log.debug("Received unexpected RoleReply {} from " |
| 234 | + "Switch: {}. " |
| 235 | + "This controller has no current role for this sw. " |
| 236 | + "Ignoring ...", new Object[] {rri, |
| 237 | sw.getStringId(), }); |
| 238 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 239 | } |
| 240 | |
| 241 | int xid = (int) rri.getXid(); |
| 242 | RoleState role = rri.getRole(); |
| 243 | // XXX S should check generation id meaningfully and other cases of expectations |
| 244 | // U64 genId = rri.getGenId(); |
| 245 | |
| 246 | if (pendingXid != xid) { |
| 247 | log.debug("Received older role reply from " + |
| 248 | "switch {} ({}). Ignoring. " + |
| 249 | "Waiting for {}, xid={}", |
| 250 | new Object[] {sw.getStringId(), rri, |
| 251 | pendingRole, pendingXid }); |
| 252 | return RoleRecvStatus.OLD_REPLY; |
| 253 | } |
| 254 | |
| 255 | if (pendingRole == role) { |
| 256 | log.debug("Received role reply message from {} that matched " |
| 257 | + "expected role-reply {} with expectations {}", |
| 258 | new Object[] {sw.getStringId(), role, expectation}); |
| 259 | |
| 260 | //setSwitchRole(role, RoleRecvStatus.RECEIVED_REPLY); dont want to set state here |
| 261 | if (expectation == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE || |
| 262 | expectation == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 263 | return expectation; |
| 264 | } else { |
| 265 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 266 | } |
| 267 | } |
| 268 | |
| 269 | // if xids match but role's don't, perhaps its a query (OF1.3) |
| 270 | if (expectation == RoleRecvStatus.REPLY_QUERY) { |
| 271 | return expectation; |
| 272 | } |
| 273 | |
| 274 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 275 | } |
| 276 | |
| 277 | /** |
| 278 | * Called if we receive an error message. If the xid matches the |
| 279 | * pending request we handle it otherwise we ignore it. |
| 280 | * |
| 281 | * Note: since we only keep the last pending request we might get |
| 282 | * error messages for earlier role requests that we won't be able |
| 283 | * to handle |
| 284 | */ |
| 285 | synchronized RoleRecvStatus deliverError(OFErrorMsg error) |
| 286 | throws SwitchStateException { |
| 287 | if (!requestPending) { |
| 288 | log.debug("Received an error msg from sw {}, but no pending " |
| 289 | + "requests in role-changer; not handling ...", |
| 290 | sw.getStringId()); |
| 291 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 292 | } |
| 293 | if (pendingXid != error.getXid()) { |
| 294 | if (error.getErrType() == OFErrorType.ROLE_REQUEST_FAILED) { |
| 295 | log.debug("Received an error msg from sw {} for a role request," |
| 296 | + " but not for pending request in role-changer; " |
| 297 | + " ignoring error {} ...", |
| 298 | sw.getStringId(), error); |
| 299 | } |
| 300 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 301 | } |
| 302 | // it is an error related to a currently pending role request message |
| 303 | if (error.getErrType() == OFErrorType.BAD_REQUEST) { |
| 304 | log.error("Received a error msg {} from sw {} for " |
| 305 | + "pending role request {}. Switch driver indicates " |
| 306 | + "role-messaging is supported. Possible issues in " |
| 307 | + "switch driver configuration?", new Object[] { |
| 308 | ((OFBadRequestErrorMsg) error).toString(), |
| 309 | sw.getStringId(), pendingRole |
| 310 | }); |
| 311 | return RoleRecvStatus.UNSUPPORTED; |
| 312 | } |
| 313 | |
| 314 | if (error.getErrType() == OFErrorType.ROLE_REQUEST_FAILED) { |
| 315 | OFRoleRequestFailedErrorMsg rrerr = |
| 316 | (OFRoleRequestFailedErrorMsg) error; |
| 317 | switch (rrerr.getCode()) { |
| 318 | case BAD_ROLE: |
| 319 | // switch says that current-role-req has bad role? |
| 320 | // for now we disconnect |
| 321 | // fall-thru |
| 322 | case STALE: |
| 323 | // switch says that current-role-req has stale gen-id? |
| 324 | // for now we disconnect |
| 325 | // fall-thru |
| 326 | case UNSUP: |
| 327 | // switch says that current-role-req has role that |
| 328 | // cannot be supported? for now we disconnect |
| 329 | String msgx = String.format("Switch: [%s], " |
| 330 | + "received Error to for pending role request [%s]. " |
| 331 | + "Error:[%s]. Disconnecting switch ... ", |
| 332 | sw.getStringId(), |
| 333 | pendingRole, rrerr); |
| 334 | throw new SwitchStateException(msgx); |
| 335 | default: |
| 336 | break; |
| 337 | } |
| 338 | } |
| 339 | |
| 340 | // This error message was for a role request message but we dont know |
| 341 | // how to handle errors for nicira role request messages |
| 342 | return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| 343 | } |
| 344 | |
| 345 | /** |
| 346 | * Extract the role from an OFVendor message. |
| 347 | * |
| 348 | * Extract the role from an OFVendor message if the message is a |
| 349 | * Nicira role reply. Otherwise return null. |
| 350 | * |
| 351 | * @param h The channel handler receiving the message |
| 352 | * @param vendorMessage The vendor message to parse. |
| 353 | * @return The role in the message if the message is a Nicira role |
| 354 | * reply, null otherwise. |
| 355 | * @throws SwitchStateException If the message is a Nicira role reply |
| 356 | * but the numeric role value is unknown. |
| 357 | */ |
| 358 | protected RoleState extractNiciraRoleReply(OFExperimenter experimenterMsg) |
| 359 | throws SwitchStateException { |
| 360 | int vendor = (int) experimenterMsg.getExperimenter(); |
| 361 | if (vendor != 0x2320) { |
| 362 | return null; |
| 363 | } |
| 364 | OFNiciraControllerRoleReply nrr = |
| 365 | (OFNiciraControllerRoleReply) experimenterMsg; |
| 366 | |
| 367 | RoleState role = null; |
| 368 | OFNiciraControllerRole ncr = nrr.getRole(); |
| 369 | switch(ncr) { |
| 370 | case ROLE_MASTER: |
| 371 | role = RoleState.MASTER; |
| 372 | break; |
| 373 | case ROLE_OTHER: |
| 374 | role = RoleState.EQUAL; |
| 375 | break; |
| 376 | case ROLE_SLAVE: |
| 377 | role = RoleState.SLAVE; |
| 378 | break; |
| 379 | default: //handled below |
| 380 | } |
| 381 | |
| 382 | if (role == null) { |
| 383 | String msg = String.format("Switch: [%s], " |
| 384 | + "received NX_ROLE_REPLY with invalid role " |
| 385 | + "value %s", |
| 386 | sw.getStringId(), |
| 387 | nrr.getRole()); |
| 388 | throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| 389 | } |
| 390 | return role; |
| 391 | } |
| 392 | |
| 393 | /** |
| 394 | * When we remove a pending role request we use this enum to indicate how we |
| 395 | * arrived at the decision. When we send a role request to the switch, we |
| 396 | * also use this enum to indicate what we expect back from the switch, so the |
| 397 | * role changer can match the reply to our expectation. |
| 398 | */ |
| 399 | public enum RoleRecvStatus { |
| 400 | /** The switch returned an error indicating that roles are not. |
| 401 | * supported*/ |
| 402 | UNSUPPORTED, |
| 403 | /** The request timed out. */ |
| 404 | NO_REPLY, |
| 405 | /** The reply was old, there is a newer request pending. */ |
| 406 | OLD_REPLY, |
| 407 | /** |
| 408 | * The reply's role matched the role that this controller set in the |
| 409 | * request message - invoked either initially at startup or to reassert |
| 410 | * current role. |
| 411 | */ |
| 412 | MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE, |
| 413 | /** |
| 414 | * The reply's role matched the role that this controller set in the |
| 415 | * request message - this is the result of a callback from the |
| 416 | * global registry, followed by a role request sent to the switch. |
| 417 | */ |
| 418 | MATCHED_SET_ROLE, |
| 419 | /** |
| 420 | * The reply's role was a response to the query made by this controller. |
| 421 | */ |
| 422 | REPLY_QUERY, |
| 423 | /** We received a role reply message from the switch |
| 424 | * but the expectation was unclear, or there was no expectation. |
| 425 | */ |
| 426 | OTHER_EXPECTATION, |
| 427 | } |
| 428 | |
| 429 | /** |
| 430 | * Helper class returns role reply information in the format understood |
| 431 | * by the controller. |
| 432 | */ |
| 433 | protected static class RoleReplyInfo { |
| 434 | private RoleState role; |
| 435 | private U64 genId; |
| 436 | private long xid; |
| 437 | |
| 438 | RoleReplyInfo(RoleState role, U64 genId, long xid) { |
| 439 | this.role = role; |
| 440 | this.genId = genId; |
| 441 | this.xid = xid; |
| 442 | } |
| 443 | public RoleState getRole() { return role; } |
| 444 | public U64 getGenId() { return genId; } |
| 445 | public long getXid() { return xid; } |
| 446 | @Override |
| 447 | public String toString() { |
| 448 | return "[Role:" + role + " GenId:" + genId + " Xid:" + xid + "]"; |
| 449 | } |
| 450 | } |
| 451 | |
| 452 | /** |
| 453 | * Extract the role information from an OF1.3 Role Reply Message. |
| 454 | * @param h |
| 455 | * @param rrmsg |
| 456 | * @return RoleReplyInfo object |
| 457 | * @throws SwitchStateException |
| 458 | */ |
| 459 | protected RoleReplyInfo extractOFRoleReply(OFRoleReply rrmsg) |
| 460 | throws SwitchStateException { |
| 461 | OFControllerRole cr = rrmsg.getRole(); |
| 462 | RoleState role = null; |
| 463 | switch(cr) { |
| 464 | case ROLE_EQUAL: |
| 465 | role = RoleState.EQUAL; |
| 466 | break; |
| 467 | case ROLE_MASTER: |
| 468 | role = RoleState.MASTER; |
| 469 | break; |
| 470 | case ROLE_SLAVE: |
| 471 | role = RoleState.SLAVE; |
| 472 | break; |
| 473 | case ROLE_NOCHANGE: // switch should send current role |
| 474 | default: |
| 475 | String msg = String.format("Unknown controller role %s " |
| 476 | + "received from switch %s", cr, sw); |
| 477 | throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| 478 | } |
| 479 | |
| 480 | return new RoleReplyInfo(role, rrmsg.getGenerationId(), rrmsg.getXid()); |
| 481 | } |
| 482 | |
| 483 | } |
| 484 | |
| 485 | |
| 486 | ///** |
| 487 | // * We are waiting for a role reply message in response to a role request |
| 488 | // * sent after hearing back from the registry service -- OR -- we are |
| 489 | // * just waiting to hear back from the registry service in the case that |
| 490 | // * the switch does not support role messages. If completed successfully, |
| 491 | // * the controller's role for this switch will be set here. |
| 492 | // * Before we move to the state corresponding to the role, we allow the |
| 493 | // * switch specific driver to complete its configuration. This configuration |
| 494 | // * typically depends on the role the controller is playing for this switch. |
| 495 | // * And so we set the switch role (for 'this' controller) before we start |
| 496 | // * the driver-sub-handshake. |
| 497 | // * Next State: WAIT_SWITCH_DRIVER_SUB_HANDSHAKE |
| 498 | // */ |
| 499 | //WAIT_INITIAL_ROLE(false) { |
| 500 | // @Override |
| 501 | // void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| 502 | // throws SwitchStateException { |
| 503 | // // role changer will ignore the error if it isn't for it |
| 504 | // RoleRecvStatus rrstatus = h.roleChanger.deliverError(m); |
| 505 | // if (rrstatus == RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION) { |
| 506 | // logError(h, m); |
| 507 | // } |
| 508 | // } |
| 509 | // |
| 510 | // @Override |
| 511 | // void processOFExperimenter(OFChannelHandler h, OFExperimenter m) |
| 512 | // throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| 513 | // Role role = extractNiciraRoleReply(h, m); |
| 514 | // // If role == null it means the vendor (experimenter) message |
| 515 | // // wasn't really a Nicira role reply. We ignore this case. |
| 516 | // if (role != null) { |
| 517 | // RoleReplyInfo rri = new RoleReplyInfo(role, null, m.getXid()); |
| 518 | // RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| 519 | // if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 520 | // setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(h, rri.getRole()); |
| 521 | // } // else do nothing - wait for the correct expected reply |
| 522 | // } else { |
| 523 | // unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| 524 | // } |
| 525 | // } |
| 526 | // |
| 527 | // @Override |
| 528 | // void processOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFRoleReply m) |
| 529 | // throws SwitchStateException, IOException { |
| 530 | // RoleReplyInfo rri = extractOFRoleReply(h, m); |
| 531 | // RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| 532 | // if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 533 | // setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(h, rri.getRole()); |
| 534 | // } // else do nothing - wait for the correct expected reply |
| 535 | // } |
| 536 | // |
| 537 | // @Override |
| 538 | // void handleUnsentRoleMessage(OFChannelHandler h, Role role, |
| 539 | // RoleRecvStatus expectation) throws IOException { |
| 540 | // // typically this is triggered for a switch where role messages |
| 541 | // // are not supported - we confirm that the role being set is |
| 542 | // // master and move to the next state |
| 543 | // if (expectation == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 544 | // if (role == Role.MASTER) { |
| 545 | // setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(h, role); |
| 546 | // } else { |
| 547 | // log.error("Expected MASTER role from registry for switch " |
| 548 | // + "which has no support for role-messages." |
| 549 | // + "Received {}. It is possible that this switch " |
| 550 | // + "is connected to other controllers, in which " |
| 551 | // + "case it should support role messages - not " |
| 552 | // + "moving forward.", role); |
| 553 | // } |
| 554 | // } // else do nothing - wait to hear back from registry |
| 555 | // |
| 556 | // } |
| 557 | // |
| 558 | // private void setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(OFChannelHandler h, |
| 559 | // Role role) throws IOException { |
| 560 | // h.setSwitchRole(role); |
| 561 | // h.sw.startDriverHandshake(); |
| 562 | // if (h.sw.isDriverHandshakeComplete()) { |
| 563 | // Role mySwitchRole = h.sw.getRole(); |
| 564 | // if (mySwitchRole == Role.MASTER) { |
| 565 | // log.info("Switch-driver sub-handshake complete. " |
| 566 | // + "Activating switch {} with Role: MASTER", |
| 567 | // h.sw.getStringId()); |
| 568 | // handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h); //before activation |
| 569 | // boolean success = h.sw.addActivatedMasterSwitch(); |
| 570 | // if (!success) { |
| 571 | // disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| 572 | // return; |
| 573 | // } |
| 574 | // h.setState(MASTER); |
| 575 | // } else { |
| 576 | // log.info("Switch-driver sub-handshake complete. " |
| 577 | // + "Activating switch {} with Role: EQUAL", |
| 578 | // h.sw.getStringId()); |
| 579 | // handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h); //before activation |
| 580 | // boolean success = h.sw.addActivatedEqualSwitch(); |
| 581 | // if (!success) { |
| 582 | // disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| 583 | // return; |
| 584 | // } |
| 585 | // h.setState(EQUAL); |
| 586 | // } |
| 587 | // } else { |
| 588 | // h.setState(WAIT_SWITCH_DRIVER_SUB_HANDSHAKE); |
| 589 | // } |
| 590 | // } |
| 591 | // |
| 592 | // @Override |
| 593 | // void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| 594 | // throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| 595 | // illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| 596 | // } |
| 597 | // |
| 598 | // @Override |
| 599 | // void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFStatsReply m) |
| 600 | // throws SwitchStateException { |
| 601 | // illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| 602 | // } |
| 603 | // |
| 604 | // @Override |
| 605 | // void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| 606 | // throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| 607 | // h.pendingPortStatusMsg.add(m); |
| 608 | // |
| 609 | // } |
| 610 | //}, |
| 611 | |
| 612 | |
| 613 | |
| 614 | |
| 615 | |
| 616 | |
| 617 | |
| 618 | ///** |
| 619 | // * This controller is in EQUAL role for this switch. We enter this state |
| 620 | // * after some /other/ controller instance wins mastership-role over this |
| 621 | // * switch. The EQUAL role can be considered the same as the SLAVE role |
| 622 | // * if this controller does NOT send commands or packets to the switch. |
| 623 | // * This should always be true for OF1.0 switches. XXX S need to enforce. |
| 624 | // * |
| 625 | // * For OF1.3 switches, choosing this state as EQUAL instead of SLAVE, |
| 626 | // * gives us the flexibility that if an app wants to send commands/packets |
| 627 | // * to switches, it can, even thought it is running on a controller instance |
| 628 | // * that is not in a MASTER role for this switch. Of course, it is the job |
| 629 | // * of the app to ensure that commands/packets sent by this (EQUAL) controller |
| 630 | // * instance does not clash/conflict with commands/packets sent by the MASTER |
| 631 | // * controller for this switch. Neither the controller instances, nor the |
| 632 | // * switch provides any kind of resolution mechanism should conflicts occur. |
| 633 | // */ |
| 634 | //EQUAL(true) { |
| 635 | // @Override |
| 636 | // void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| 637 | // throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| 638 | // // role changer will ignore the error if it isn't for it |
| 639 | // RoleRecvStatus rrstatus = h.roleChanger.deliverError(m); |
| 640 | // if (rrstatus == RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION) { |
| 641 | // logError(h, m); |
| 642 | // h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| 643 | // } |
| 644 | // } |
| 645 | // |
| 646 | // @Override |
| 647 | // void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| 648 | // OFStatsReply m) { |
| 649 | // h.sw.handleMessage(m); |
| 650 | // } |
| 651 | // |
| 652 | // @Override |
| 653 | // void processOFExperimenter(OFChannelHandler h, OFExperimenter m) |
| 654 | // throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| 655 | // Role role = extractNiciraRoleReply(h, m); |
| 656 | // // If role == null it means the message wasn't really a |
| 657 | // // Nicira role reply. We ignore it in this state. |
| 658 | // if (role != null) { |
| 659 | // RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply( |
| 660 | // new RoleReplyInfo(role, null, m.getXid())); |
| 661 | // if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 662 | // checkAndSetRoleTransition(h, role); |
| 663 | // } |
| 664 | // } else { |
| 665 | // unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| 666 | // } |
| 667 | // } |
| 668 | // |
| 669 | // @Override |
| 670 | // void processOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFRoleReply m) |
| 671 | // throws SwitchStateException, IOException { |
| 672 | // RoleReplyInfo rri = extractOFRoleReply(h, m); |
| 673 | // RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| 674 | // if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| 675 | // checkAndSetRoleTransition(h, rri.getRole()); |
| 676 | // } |
| 677 | // } |
| 678 | // |
| 679 | // // XXX S needs more handlers for 1.3 switches in equal role |
| 680 | // |
| 681 | // @Override |
| 682 | // void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| 683 | // throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| 684 | // handlePortStatusMessage(h, m, true); |
| 685 | // } |
| 686 | // |
| 687 | // @Override |
| 688 | // @LogMessageDoc(level = "WARN", |
| 689 | // message = "Received PacketIn from switch {} while " |
| 690 | // + "being slave. Reasserting slave role.", |
| 691 | // explanation = "The switch has receive a PacketIn despite being " |
| 692 | // + "in slave role indicating inconsistent controller roles", |
| 693 | // recommendation = "This situation can occurs transiently during role" |
| 694 | // + " changes. If, however, the condition persists or happens" |
| 695 | // + " frequently this indicates a role inconsistency. " |
| 696 | // + LogMessageDoc.CHECK_CONTROLLER) |
| 697 | // void processOFPacketIn(OFChannelHandler h, OFPacketIn m) throws IOException { |
| 698 | // // we don't expect packetIn while slave, reassert we are slave |
| 699 | // h.counters.packetInWhileSwitchIsSlave.updateCounterNoFlush(); |
| 700 | // log.warn("Received PacketIn from switch {} while" + |
| 701 | // "being slave. Reasserting slave role.", h.sw); |
| 702 | // //h.controller.reassertRole(h, Role.SLAVE); |
| 703 | // // XXX reassert in role changer |
| 704 | // } |
| 705 | //}; |