Fix naming convention issues in preparation for stricter checkstyle enforcement

Change-Id: I918b7b1dcf6424a526b6b26b89acc9a57d807fec
diff --git a/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/SRLGGraphSearch.java b/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/SrlgGraphSearch.java
similarity index 97%
rename from utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/SRLGGraphSearch.java
rename to utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/SrlgGraphSearch.java
index 21f687a..fa3d0dd 100644
--- a/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/SRLGGraphSearch.java
+++ b/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/SrlgGraphSearch.java
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
  * if one path goes through an edge in risk group 1, the other path will go
  * through no edges in risk group 1.
  */
-public class SRLGGraphSearch<V extends Vertex, E extends Edge<V>>
+public class SrlgGraphSearch<V extends Vertex, E extends Edge<V>>
         extends AbstractGraphPathSearch<V, E> {
 
     static final int ITERATIONS = 100;
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
      * @param   groups      the number of disjoint risk groups
      * @param   grouping    map linking edges to integral group assignments
      */
-    public SRLGGraphSearch(int groups, Map<E, Integer> grouping) {
+    public SrlgGraphSearch(int groups, Map<E, Integer> grouping) {
         numGroups = groups;
         riskGrouping = grouping;
     }
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
      * @param   grouping    map linking edges to object group assignments,
      *                      with same-group status linked to equality
      */
-    public SRLGGraphSearch(Map<E, Object> grouping) {
+    public SrlgGraphSearch(Map<E, Object> grouping) {
         if (grouping == null) {
             useSuurballe = true;
             return;
diff --git a/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/TarjanGraphSearch.java b/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/TarjanGraphSearch.java
index 5bf305e..1c436d9 100644
--- a/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/TarjanGraphSearch.java
+++ b/utils/misc/src/main/java/org/onlab/graph/TarjanGraphSearch.java
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
      * </p>
      */
     @Override
-    public SCCResult<V, E> search(Graph<V, E> graph, EdgeWeight<V, E> weight) {
-        SCCResult<V, E> result = new SCCResult<>(graph);
+    public SccResult<V, E> search(Graph<V, E> graph, EdgeWeight<V, E> weight) {
+        SccResult<V, E> result = new SccResult<>(graph);
         for (V vertex : graph.getVertexes()) {
             VertexData data = result.data(vertex);
             if (data == null) {
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
      */
     private VertexData<V> connect(Graph<V, E> graph, V vertex,
                                   EdgeWeight<V, E> weight,
-                                  SCCResult<V, E> result) {
+                                  SccResult<V, E> result) {
         VertexData<V> data = result.addData(vertex);
 
         // Scan through all egress edges of the current vertex.
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
     /**
      * Graph search result augmented with SCC vertexData.
      */
-    public static final class SCCResult<V extends Vertex, E extends Edge<V>>
+    public static final class SccResult<V extends Vertex, E extends Edge<V>>
             implements Result {
 
         private final Graph<V, E> graph;
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
         private final Map<V, VertexData<V>> vertexData = new HashMap<>();
         private final List<VertexData<V>> visited = new ArrayList<>();
 
-        private SCCResult(Graph<V, E> graph) {
+        private SccResult(Graph<V, E> graph) {
             this.graph = graph;
         }
 
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
             return Collections.unmodifiableSet(edges);
         }
 
-        public SCCResult<V, E> build() {
+        public SccResult<V, E> build() {
             clusterVertexes = Collections.unmodifiableList(clusterVertexes);
             clusterEdges = Collections.unmodifiableList(clusterEdges);
             return this;