| package net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.internal; |
| |
| import java.io.IOException; |
| import java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException; |
| import java.util.ArrayList; |
| import java.util.Collection; |
| import java.util.Collections; |
| import java.util.List; |
| import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList; |
| import java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException; |
| |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.IOFSwitch; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.IOFSwitch.PortChangeEvent; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.Role; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.annotations.LogMessageDoc; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.annotations.LogMessageDocs; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.debugcounter.IDebugCounterService.CounterException; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.internal.Controller.Counters; |
| import net.onrc.onos.of.ctl.internal.OFChannelHandler.ChannelState.RoleReplyInfo; |
| |
| import org.jboss.netty.channel.Channel; |
| import org.jboss.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext; |
| import org.jboss.netty.channel.ChannelStateEvent; |
| import org.jboss.netty.channel.ExceptionEvent; |
| import org.jboss.netty.channel.MessageEvent; |
| import org.jboss.netty.handler.timeout.IdleStateAwareChannelHandler; |
| import org.jboss.netty.handler.timeout.IdleStateEvent; |
| import org.jboss.netty.handler.timeout.ReadTimeoutException; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.exceptions.OFParseError; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFAsyncGetReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFBadRequestCode; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFBarrierReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFBarrierRequest; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFControllerRole; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFDescStatsReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFDescStatsRequest; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFEchoReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFEchoRequest; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFErrorMsg; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFErrorType; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFExperimenter; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFFactory; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFFeaturesReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFFlowModFailedCode; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFFlowRemoved; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFGetConfigReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFGetConfigRequest; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFHello; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFHelloElem; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFMessage; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFNiciraControllerRole; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFNiciraControllerRoleReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFPacketIn; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFPortDescStatsReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFPortDescStatsRequest; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFPortStatus; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFQueueGetConfigReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFRoleReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFRoleRequest; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFSetConfig; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFStatsReply; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFStatsReplyFlags; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFStatsType; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFType; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.OFVersion; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.errormsg.OFBadRequestErrorMsg; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.errormsg.OFFlowModFailedErrorMsg; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.protocol.errormsg.OFRoleRequestFailedErrorMsg; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.types.U32; |
| import org.projectfloodlight.openflow.types.U64; |
| import org.slf4j.Logger; |
| import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; |
| /** |
| * Channel handler deals with the switch connection and dispatches |
| * switch messages to the appropriate locations. |
| */ |
| class OFChannelHandler extends IdleStateAwareChannelHandler { |
| private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(OFChannelHandler.class); |
| private static final long DEFAULT_ROLE_TIMEOUT_MS = 2 * 1000; // 10 sec |
| private final Controller controller; |
| private final Counters counters; |
| private IOFSwitch sw; |
| private long thisdpid; // channelHandler cached value of connected switch id |
| private Channel channel; |
| // State needs to be volatile because the HandshakeTimeoutHandler |
| // needs to check if the handshake is complete |
| private volatile ChannelState state; |
| |
| // All role messaging is handled by the roleChanger. The channel state machine |
| // coordinates between the roleChanger and the controller-global-registry-service |
| // to determine controller roles per switch. |
| private RoleChanger roleChanger; |
| // Used to coordinate between the controller and the cleanup thread(?) |
| // for access to the global registry on a per switch basis. |
| volatile Boolean controlRequested; |
| // When a switch with a duplicate dpid is found (i.e we already have a |
| // connected switch with the same dpid), the new switch is immediately |
| // disconnected. At that point netty callsback channelDisconnected() which |
| // proceeds to cleaup switch state - we need to ensure that it does not cleanup |
| // switch state for the older (still connected) switch |
| private volatile Boolean duplicateDpidFound; |
| |
| // Temporary storage for switch-features and port-description |
| private OFFeaturesReply featuresReply; |
| private OFPortDescStatsReply portDescReply; |
| // a concurrent ArrayList to temporarily store port status messages |
| // before we are ready to deal with them |
| private final CopyOnWriteArrayList<OFPortStatus> pendingPortStatusMsg; |
| |
| //Indicates the openflow version used by this switch |
| protected OFVersion ofVersion; |
| protected OFFactory factory13; |
| protected OFFactory factory10; |
| |
| /** transaction Ids to use during handshake. Since only one thread |
| * calls into an OFChannelHandler instance, we don't need atomic. |
| * We will count down |
| */ |
| private int handshakeTransactionIds = -1; |
| |
| /** |
| * Create a new unconnected OFChannelHandler. |
| * @param controller |
| */ |
| OFChannelHandler(Controller controller) { |
| this.controller = controller; |
| this.counters = controller.getCounters(); |
| this.roleChanger = new RoleChanger(DEFAULT_ROLE_TIMEOUT_MS); |
| this.state = ChannelState.INIT; |
| this.pendingPortStatusMsg = new CopyOnWriteArrayList<OFPortStatus>(); |
| factory13 = controller.getOFMessageFactory13(); |
| factory10 = controller.getOFMessageFactory10(); |
| controlRequested = Boolean.FALSE; |
| duplicateDpidFound = Boolean.FALSE; |
| } |
| |
| //******************* |
| // Role Handling |
| //******************* |
| |
| /** |
| * When we remove a pending role request we use this enum to indicate how we |
| * arrived at the decision. When we send a role request to the switch, we |
| * also use this enum to indicate what we expect back from the switch, so the |
| * role changer can match the reply to our expectation. |
| */ |
| public enum RoleRecvStatus { |
| /** The switch returned an error indicating that roles are not. |
| * supported*/ |
| UNSUPPORTED, |
| /** The request timed out. */ |
| NO_REPLY, |
| /** The reply was old, there is a newer request pending. */ |
| OLD_REPLY, |
| /** |
| * The reply's role matched the role that this controller set in the |
| * request message - invoked either initially at startup or to reassert |
| * current role. |
| */ |
| MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE, |
| /** |
| * The reply's role matched the role that this controller set in the |
| * request message - this is the result of a callback from the |
| * global registry, followed by a role request sent to the switch. |
| */ |
| MATCHED_SET_ROLE, |
| /** |
| * The reply's role was a response to the query made by this controller. |
| */ |
| REPLY_QUERY, |
| /** We received a role reply message from the switch |
| * but the expectation was unclear, or there was no expectation. |
| */ |
| OTHER_EXPECTATION, |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Forwards to RoleChanger. See there. |
| * @param role |
| */ |
| public void sendRoleRequest(Role role, RoleRecvStatus expectation) { |
| try { |
| roleChanger.sendRoleRequest(role, expectation); |
| } catch (IOException e) { |
| log.error("Disconnecting switch {} due to IO Error: {}", |
| getSwitchInfoString(), e.getMessage()); |
| channel.close(); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // XXX S consider if necessary |
| public void disconnectSwitch() { |
| sw.disconnectSwitch(); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * A utility class to handle role requests and replies for this channel. |
| * After a role request is submitted the role changer keeps track of the |
| * pending request, collects the reply (if any) and times out the request |
| * if necessary. |
| * |
| * To simplify role handling we only keep track of the /last/ pending |
| * role reply send to the switch. If multiple requests are pending and |
| * we receive replies for earlier requests we ignore them. However, this |
| * way of handling pending requests implies that we could wait forever if |
| * a new request is submitted before the timeout triggers. If necessary |
| * we could work around that though. |
| */ |
| private class RoleChanger { |
| // indicates that a request is currently pending |
| // needs to be volatile to allow correct double-check idiom |
| private volatile boolean requestPending; |
| // the transaction Id of the pending request |
| private int pendingXid; |
| // the role that's pending |
| private Role pendingRole; |
| // system time in MS when we send the request |
| private long roleSubmitTime; |
| // the timeout to use |
| private final long roleTimeoutMs; |
| // the expectation set by the caller for the returned role |
| private RoleRecvStatus expectation; |
| |
| public RoleChanger(long roleTimeoutMs) { |
| this.requestPending = false; |
| this.roleSubmitTime = 0; |
| this.pendingXid = -1; |
| this.pendingRole = null; |
| this.roleTimeoutMs = roleTimeoutMs; |
| this.expectation = RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Send NX role request message to the switch requesting the specified |
| * role. |
| * |
| * @param sw switch to send the role request message to |
| * @param role role to request |
| */ |
| private int sendNxRoleRequest(Role role) throws IOException { |
| // Convert the role enum to the appropriate role to send |
| OFNiciraControllerRole roleToSend = OFNiciraControllerRole.ROLE_OTHER; |
| switch (role) { |
| case MASTER: |
| roleToSend = OFNiciraControllerRole.ROLE_MASTER; |
| break; |
| case SLAVE: |
| case EQUAL: |
| default: |
| // ensuring that the only two roles sent to 1.0 switches with |
| // Nicira role support, are MASTER and SLAVE |
| roleToSend = OFNiciraControllerRole.ROLE_SLAVE; |
| log.warn("Sending Nx Role.SLAVE to switch {}.", sw); |
| } |
| int xid = sw.getNextTransactionId(); |
| OFExperimenter roleRequest = factory10 |
| .buildNiciraControllerRoleRequest() |
| .setXid(xid) |
| .setRole(roleToSend) |
| .build(); |
| sw.write(Collections.<OFMessage>singletonList(roleRequest)); |
| return xid; |
| } |
| |
| private int sendOF13RoleRequest(Role role) throws IOException { |
| // Convert the role enum to the appropriate role to send |
| OFControllerRole roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_NOCHANGE; |
| switch (role) { |
| case EQUAL: |
| roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_EQUAL; |
| break; |
| case MASTER: |
| roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_MASTER; |
| break; |
| case SLAVE: |
| roleToSend = OFControllerRole.ROLE_SLAVE; |
| break; |
| default: |
| log.warn("Sending default role.noChange to switch {}." |
| + " Should only be used for queries.", sw); |
| } |
| |
| int xid = sw.getNextTransactionId(); |
| OFRoleRequest rrm = factory13 |
| .buildRoleRequest() |
| .setRole(roleToSend) |
| .setXid(xid) |
| .setGenerationId(sw.getNextGenerationId()) |
| .build(); |
| sw.write(rrm); |
| return xid; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Send a role request with the given role to the switch and update |
| * the pending request and timestamp. |
| * Sends an OFPT_ROLE_REQUEST to an OF1.3 switch, OR |
| * Sends an NX_ROLE_REQUEST to an OF1.0 switch if configured to support it |
| * in the IOFSwitch driver. If not supported, this method sends nothing |
| * and returns 'false'. The caller should take appropriate action. |
| * |
| * One other optimization we do here is that for OF1.0 switches with |
| * Nicira role message support, we force the Role.EQUAL to become |
| * Role.SLAVE, as there is no defined behavior for the Nicira role OTHER. |
| * We cannot expect it to behave like SLAVE. We don't have this problem with |
| * OF1.3 switches, because Role.EQUAL is well defined and we can simulate |
| * SLAVE behavior by using ASYNC messages. |
| * |
| * @param role |
| * @throws IOException |
| * @returns false if and only if the switch does not support role-request |
| * messages, according to the switch driver; true otherwise. |
| */ |
| synchronized boolean sendRoleRequest(Role role, RoleRecvStatus exp) |
| throws IOException { |
| this.expectation = exp; |
| |
| if (ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_10) { |
| Boolean supportsNxRole = (Boolean) |
| sw.getAttribute(IOFSwitch.SWITCH_SUPPORTS_NX_ROLE); |
| if (!supportsNxRole) { |
| log.debug("Switch driver indicates no support for Nicira " |
| + "role request messages. Not sending ..."); |
| state.handleUnsentRoleMessage(OFChannelHandler.this, role, |
| expectation); |
| return false; |
| } |
| // OF1.0 switch with support for NX_ROLE_REQUEST vendor extn. |
| // make Role.EQUAL become Role.SLAVE |
| role = (role == Role.EQUAL) ? Role.SLAVE : role; |
| pendingXid = sendNxRoleRequest(role); |
| pendingRole = role; |
| roleSubmitTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); |
| requestPending = true; |
| } else { |
| // OF1.3 switch, use OFPT_ROLE_REQUEST message |
| pendingXid = sendOF13RoleRequest(role); |
| pendingRole = role; |
| roleSubmitTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); |
| requestPending = true; |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Deliver a received role reply. |
| * |
| * Check if a request is pending and if the received reply matches the |
| * the expected pending reply (we check both role and xid) we set |
| * the role for the switch/channel. |
| * |
| * If a request is pending but doesn't match the reply we ignore it, and |
| * return |
| * |
| * If no request is pending we disconnect with a SwitchStateException |
| * |
| * @param RoleReplyInfo information about role-reply in format that |
| * controller can understand. |
| * @throws SwitchStateException if no request is pending |
| */ |
| synchronized RoleRecvStatus deliverRoleReply(RoleReplyInfo rri) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| if (!requestPending) { |
| Role currentRole = (sw != null) ? sw.getRole() : null; |
| if (currentRole != null) { |
| if (currentRole == rri.getRole()) { |
| // Don't disconnect if the role reply we received is |
| // for the same role we are already in. |
| log.debug("Received unexpected RoleReply from " |
| + "Switch: {} in State: {}. " |
| + "Role in reply is same as current role of this " |
| + "controller for this sw. Ignoring ...", |
| getSwitchInfoString(), state.toString()); |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } else { |
| String msg = String.format("Switch: [%s], State: [%s], " |
| + "received unexpected RoleReply[%s]. " |
| + "No roles are pending, and this controller's " |
| + "current role:[%s] does not match reply. " |
| + "Disconnecting switch ... ", |
| OFChannelHandler.this.getSwitchInfoString(), |
| OFChannelHandler.this.state.toString(), |
| rri, currentRole); |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| } |
| } |
| log.debug("Received unexpected RoleReply {} from " |
| + "Switch: {} in State: {}. " |
| + "This controller has no current role for this sw. " |
| + "Ignoring ...", new Object[] {rri, |
| getSwitchInfoString(), state}); |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } |
| |
| int xid = (int) rri.getXid(); |
| Role role = rri.getRole(); |
| // XXX S should check generation id meaningfully and other cases of expectations |
| // U64 genId = rri.getGenId(); |
| |
| if (pendingXid != xid) { |
| log.debug("Received older role reply from " + |
| "switch {} ({}). Ignoring. " + |
| "Waiting for {}, xid={}", |
| new Object[] {getSwitchInfoString(), rri, |
| pendingRole, pendingXid }); |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OLD_REPLY; |
| } |
| |
| if (pendingRole == role) { |
| log.debug("Received role reply message from {} that matched " |
| + "expected role-reply {} with expectations {}", |
| new Object[] {getSwitchInfoString(), role, expectation}); |
| counters.roleReplyReceived.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| //setSwitchRole(role, RoleRecvStatus.RECEIVED_REPLY); dont want to set state here |
| if (expectation == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE || |
| expectation == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| return expectation; |
| } else { |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // if xids match but role's don't, perhaps its a query (OF1.3) |
| if (expectation == RoleRecvStatus.REPLY_QUERY) { |
| return expectation; |
| } |
| |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Called if we receive an error message. If the xid matches the |
| * pending request we handle it otherwise we ignore it. |
| * |
| * Note: since we only keep the last pending request we might get |
| * error messages for earlier role requests that we won't be able |
| * to handle |
| */ |
| synchronized RoleRecvStatus deliverError(OFErrorMsg error) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| if (!requestPending) { |
| log.debug("Received an error msg from sw {}, but no pending " |
| + "requests in role-changer; not handling ...", |
| getSwitchInfoString()); |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } |
| if (pendingXid != error.getXid()) { |
| if (error.getErrType() == OFErrorType.ROLE_REQUEST_FAILED) { |
| log.debug("Received an error msg from sw {} for a role request," |
| + " but not for pending request in role-changer; " |
| + " ignoring error {} ...", |
| getSwitchInfoString(), error); |
| } |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } |
| // it is an error related to a currently pending role request message |
| if (error.getErrType() == OFErrorType.BAD_REQUEST) { |
| counters.roleReplyErrorUnsupported.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| log.error("Received a error msg {} from sw {} in state {} for " |
| + "pending role request {}. Switch driver indicates " |
| + "role-messaging is supported. Possible issues in " |
| + "switch driver configuration?", new Object[] { |
| ((OFBadRequestErrorMsg) error).toString(), |
| getSwitchInfoString(), state, pendingRole |
| }); |
| return RoleRecvStatus.UNSUPPORTED; |
| } |
| |
| if (error.getErrType() == OFErrorType.ROLE_REQUEST_FAILED) { |
| OFRoleRequestFailedErrorMsg rrerr = |
| (OFRoleRequestFailedErrorMsg) error; |
| switch (rrerr.getCode()) { |
| case BAD_ROLE: |
| // switch says that current-role-req has bad role? |
| // for now we disconnect |
| // fall-thru |
| case STALE: |
| // switch says that current-role-req has stale gen-id? |
| // for now we disconnect |
| // fall-thru |
| case UNSUP: |
| // switch says that current-role-req has role that |
| // cannot be supported? for now we disconnect |
| String msgx = String.format("Switch: [%s], State: [%s], " |
| + "received Error to for pending role request [%s]. " |
| + "Error:[%s]. Disconnecting switch ... ", |
| OFChannelHandler.this.getSwitchInfoString(), |
| OFChannelHandler.this.state.toString(), |
| pendingRole, rrerr); |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msgx); |
| default: |
| break; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // This error message was for a role request message but we dont know |
| // how to handle errors for nicira role request messages |
| return RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Check if a pending role request has timed out. |
| */ |
| void checkTimeout() { |
| if (!requestPending) { |
| return; |
| } |
| synchronized (this) { |
| if (!requestPending) { |
| return; |
| } |
| long now = System.currentTimeMillis(); |
| if (now - roleSubmitTime > roleTimeoutMs) { |
| // timeout triggered. |
| counters.roleReplyTimeout.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| //setSwitchRole(pendingRole, RoleRecvStatus.NO_REPLY); |
| // XXX S come back to this |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| } |
| |
| //************************* |
| // Channel State Machine |
| //************************* |
| |
| /** |
| * The state machine for handling the switch/channel state. All state |
| * transitions should happen from within the state machine (and not from other |
| * parts of the code) |
| */ |
| enum ChannelState { |
| /** |
| * Initial state before channel is connected. |
| */ |
| INIT(false) { |
| @Override |
| void processOFMessage(OFChannelHandler h, OFMessage m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws IOException { |
| // need to implement since its abstract but it will never |
| // be called |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| /** |
| * We send a OF 1.3 HELLO to the switch and wait for a Hello from the switch. |
| * Once we receive the reply, we decide on OF 1.3 or 1.0 switch - no other |
| * protocol version is accepted. |
| * We send an OFFeaturesRequest depending on the protocol version selected |
| * Next state is WAIT_FEATURES_REPLY |
| */ |
| WAIT_HELLO(false) { |
| @Override |
| void processOFHello(OFChannelHandler h, OFHello m) |
| throws IOException { |
| // TODO We could check for the optional bitmap, but for now |
| // we are just checking the version number. |
| if (m.getVersion() == OFVersion.OF_13) { |
| log.info("Received {} Hello from {}", m.getVersion(), |
| h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| h.ofVersion = OFVersion.OF_13; |
| } else if (m.getVersion() == OFVersion.OF_10) { |
| log.info("Received {} Hello from {} - switching to OF " |
| + "version 1.0", m.getVersion(), |
| h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| h.ofVersion = OFVersion.OF_10; |
| } else { |
| log.error("Received Hello of version {} from switch at {}. " |
| + "This controller works with OF1.0 and OF1.3 " |
| + "switches. Disconnecting switch ...", |
| m.getVersion(), h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| h.channel.disconnect(); |
| return; |
| } |
| h.sendHandshakeFeaturesRequestMessage(); |
| h.setState(WAIT_FEATURES_REPLY); |
| } |
| @Override |
| void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFStatsReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) { |
| logErrorDisconnect(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| |
| /** |
| * We are waiting for a features reply message. Once we receive it, the |
| * behavior depends on whether this is a 1.0 or 1.3 switch. For 1.0, |
| * we send a SetConfig request, barrier, and GetConfig request and the |
| * next state is WAIT_CONFIG_REPLY. For 1.3, we send a Port description |
| * request and the next state is WAIT_PORT_DESC_REPLY. |
| */ |
| WAIT_FEATURES_REPLY(false) { |
| @Override |
| void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| throws IOException { |
| h.thisdpid = m.getDatapathId().getLong(); |
| log.info("Received features reply for switch at {} with dpid {}", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString(), h.thisdpid); |
| //update the controller about this connected switch |
| boolean success = h.controller.addConnectedSwitch( |
| h.thisdpid, h); |
| if (!success) { |
| disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| h.featuresReply = m; //temp store |
| if (h.ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_10) { |
| h.sendHandshakeSetConfig(); |
| h.setState(WAIT_CONFIG_REPLY); |
| } else { |
| //version is 1.3, must get switchport information |
| h.sendHandshakeOFPortDescRequest(); |
| h.setState(WAIT_PORT_DESC_REPLY); |
| } |
| } |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFStatsReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) { |
| logErrorDisconnect(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| /** |
| * We are waiting for a description of the 1.3 switch ports. |
| * Once received, we send a SetConfig request |
| * Next State is WAIT_CONFIG_REPLY |
| */ |
| WAIT_PORT_DESC_REPLY(false) { |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFStatsReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| // Read port description |
| if (m.getStatsType() != OFStatsType.PORT_DESC) { |
| log.warn("Expecting port description stats but received stats " |
| + "type {} from {}. Ignoring ...", m.getStatsType(), |
| h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| return; |
| } |
| if (m.getFlags().contains(OFStatsReplyFlags.REPLY_MORE)) { |
| log.warn("Stats reply indicates more stats from sw {} for " |
| + "port description - not currently handled", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| } |
| h.portDescReply = (OFPortDescStatsReply) m; // temp store |
| log.info("Received port desc reply for switch at {}", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| try { |
| h.sendHandshakeSetConfig(); |
| } catch (IOException e) { |
| log.error("Unable to send setConfig after PortDescReply. " |
| + "Error: {}", e.getMessage()); |
| } |
| h.setState(WAIT_CONFIG_REPLY); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| logErrorDisconnect(h, m); |
| |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| /** |
| * We are waiting for a config reply message. Once we receive it |
| * we send a DescriptionStatsRequest to the switch. |
| * Next state: WAIT_DESCRIPTION_STAT_REPLY |
| */ |
| WAIT_CONFIG_REPLY(false) { |
| @Override |
| @LogMessageDocs({ |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "WARN", |
| message = "Config Reply from {switch} has " |
| + "miss length set to {length}", |
| explanation = "The controller requires that the switch " |
| + "use a miss length of 0xffff for correct " |
| + "function", |
| recommendation = "Use a different switch to ensure " |
| + "correct function") |
| }) |
| void processOFGetConfigReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFGetConfigReply m) |
| throws IOException { |
| if (m.getMissSendLen() == 0xffff) { |
| log.trace("Config Reply from switch {} confirms " |
| + "miss length set to 0xffff", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| } else { |
| // FIXME: we can't really deal with switches that don't send |
| // full packets. Shouldn't we drop the connection here? |
| log.warn("Config Reply from switch {} has" |
| + "miss length set to {}", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString(), |
| m.getMissSendLen()); |
| } |
| h.sendHandshakeDescriptionStatsRequest(); |
| h.setState(WAIT_DESCRIPTION_STAT_REPLY); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFBarrierReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFBarrierReply m) { |
| // do nothing; |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFStatsReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| log.error("Received multipart(stats) message sub-type {}", |
| m.getStatsType()); |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) { |
| logErrorDisconnect(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException { |
| h.pendingPortStatusMsg.add(m); |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| |
| /** |
| * We are waiting for a OFDescriptionStat message from the switch. |
| * Once we receive any stat message we try to parse it. If it's not |
| * a description stats message we disconnect. If its the expected |
| * description stats message, we: |
| * - use the switch driver to bind the switch and get an IOFSwitch instance |
| * - setup the IOFSwitch instance |
| * - add switch controller and send the initial role |
| * request to the switch. |
| * Next state: WAIT_INITIAL_ROLE |
| * In the typical case, where switches support role request messages |
| * the next state is where we expect the role reply message. |
| * In the special case that where the switch does not support any kind |
| * of role request messages, we don't send a role message, but we do |
| * request mastership from the registry service. This controller |
| * should become master once we hear back from the registry service. |
| * All following states will have a h.sw instance! |
| */ |
| WAIT_DESCRIPTION_STAT_REPLY(false) { |
| @LogMessageDoc(message = "Switch {switch info} bound to class " |
| + "{switch driver}, description {switch description}", |
| explanation = "The specified switch has been bound to " |
| + "a switch driver based on the switch description" |
| + "received from the switch") |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFStatsReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| // Read description, if it has been updated |
| if (m.getStatsType() != OFStatsType.DESC) { |
| log.warn("Expecting Description stats but received stats " |
| + "type {} from {}. Ignoring ...", m.getStatsType(), |
| h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| return; |
| } |
| log.info("Received switch description reply from switch at {}", |
| h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| OFDescStatsReply drep = (OFDescStatsReply) m; |
| // Here is where we differentiate between different kinds of switches |
| h.sw = h.controller.getOFSwitchInstance(drep, h.ofVersion); |
| // set switch information |
| h.sw.setOFVersion(h.ofVersion); |
| h.sw.setFeaturesReply(h.featuresReply); |
| h.sw.setPortDescReply(h.portDescReply); |
| h.sw.setConnected(true); |
| h.sw.setChannel(h.channel); |
| |
| try { |
| h.sw.setDebugCounterService(h.controller.getDebugCounter()); |
| } catch (CounterException e) { |
| h.counters.switchCounterRegistrationFailed |
| .updateCounterNoFlush(); |
| log.warn("Could not register counters for switch {} ", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString(), e); |
| } |
| |
| log.info("Switch {} bound to class {}, description {}", |
| new Object[] {h.sw, h.sw.getClass(), drep }); |
| //Put switch in EQUAL mode until we hear back from the global registry |
| log.debug("Setting new switch {} to EQUAL and sending Role request", |
| h.sw.getStringId()); |
| h.setSwitchRole(Role.EQUAL); |
| try { |
| boolean supportsRRMsg = h.roleChanger.sendRoleRequest(Role.EQUAL, |
| RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_CURRENT_ROLE); |
| if (!supportsRRMsg) { |
| log.warn("Switch {} does not support role request messages " |
| + "of any kind. No role messages were sent. " |
| + "This controller instance SHOULD become MASTER " |
| + "from the registry process. ", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| } |
| h.setState(WAIT_INITIAL_ROLE); |
| // request control of switch from global registry - |
| // necessary even if this is the only controller the |
| // switch is connected to. |
| h.controller.submitRegistryRequest(h.sw.getId()); |
| } catch (IOException e) { |
| log.error("Exception when sending role request: {} ", |
| e.getMessage()); |
| // FIXME shouldn't we disconnect? |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) { |
| logErrorDisconnect(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException { |
| h.pendingPortStatusMsg.add(m); |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| /** |
| * We are waiting for a role reply message in response to a role request |
| * sent after hearing back from the registry service -- OR -- we are |
| * just waiting to hear back from the registry service in the case that |
| * the switch does not support role messages. If completed successfully, |
| * the controller's role for this switch will be set here. |
| * Before we move to the state corresponding to the role, we allow the |
| * switch specific driver to complete its configuration. This configuration |
| * typically depends on the role the controller is playing for this switch. |
| * And so we set the switch role (for 'this' controller) before we start |
| * the driver-sub-handshake. |
| * Next State: WAIT_SWITCH_DRIVER_SUB_HANDSHAKE |
| */ |
| WAIT_INITIAL_ROLE(false) { |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| // role changer will ignore the error if it isn't for it |
| RoleRecvStatus rrstatus = h.roleChanger.deliverError(m); |
| if (rrstatus == RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION) { |
| logError(h, m); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFExperimenter(OFChannelHandler h, OFExperimenter m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| Role role = extractNiciraRoleReply(h, m); |
| // If role == null it means the vendor (experimenter) message |
| // wasn't really a Nicira role reply. We ignore this case. |
| if (role != null) { |
| RoleReplyInfo rri = new RoleReplyInfo(role, null, m.getXid()); |
| RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(h, rri.getRole()); |
| } // else do nothing - wait for the correct expected reply |
| } else { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFRoleReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException, IOException { |
| RoleReplyInfo rri = extractOFRoleReply(h, m); |
| RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(h, rri.getRole()); |
| } // else do nothing - wait for the correct expected reply |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void handleUnsentRoleMessage(OFChannelHandler h, Role role, |
| RoleRecvStatus expectation) throws IOException { |
| // typically this is triggered for a switch where role messages |
| // are not supported - we confirm that the role being set is |
| // master and move to the next state |
| if (expectation == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| if (role == Role.MASTER) { |
| setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(h, role); |
| } else { |
| log.error("Expected MASTER role from registry for switch " |
| + "which has no support for role-messages." |
| + "Received {}. It is possible that this switch " |
| + "is connected to other controllers, in which " |
| + "case it should support role messages - not " |
| + "moving forward.", role); |
| } |
| } // else do nothing - wait to hear back from registry |
| |
| } |
| |
| private void setRoleAndStartDriverHandshake(OFChannelHandler h, |
| Role role) throws IOException { |
| h.setSwitchRole(role); |
| h.sw.startDriverHandshake(); |
| if (h.sw.isDriverHandshakeComplete()) { |
| Role mySwitchRole = h.sw.getRole(); |
| if (mySwitchRole == Role.MASTER) { |
| log.info("Switch-driver sub-handshake complete. " |
| + "Activating switch {} with Role: MASTER", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h); //before activation |
| boolean success = h.controller.addActivatedMasterSwitch( |
| h.sw.getId(), h.sw); |
| if (!success) { |
| disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| return; |
| } |
| h.setState(MASTER); |
| } else { |
| log.info("Switch-driver sub-handshake complete. " |
| + "Activating switch {} with Role: EQUAL", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h); //before activation |
| boolean success = h.controller.addActivatedEqualSwitch( |
| h.sw.getId(), h.sw); |
| if (!success) { |
| disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| return; |
| } |
| h.setState(EQUAL); |
| } |
| } else { |
| h.setState(WAIT_SWITCH_DRIVER_SUB_HANDSHAKE); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFStatsReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| h.pendingPortStatusMsg.add(m); |
| |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| /** |
| * We are waiting for the respective switch driver to complete its |
| * configuration. Notice that we do not consider this to be part of the main |
| * switch-controller handshake. But we do consider it as a step that comes |
| * before we declare the switch as available to the controller. |
| * Next State: depends on the role of this controller for this switch - either |
| * MASTER or EQUAL. |
| */ |
| WAIT_SWITCH_DRIVER_SUB_HANDSHAKE(true) { |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws IOException { |
| // will never be called. We override processOFMessage |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFMessage(OFChannelHandler h, OFMessage m) |
| throws IOException { |
| if (m.getType() == OFType.ECHO_REQUEST) { |
| processOFEchoRequest(h, (OFEchoRequest) m); |
| } else { |
| // FIXME: other message to handle here? |
| h.sw.processDriverHandshakeMessage(m); |
| if (h.sw.isDriverHandshakeComplete()) { |
| // consult the h.sw role and goto that state |
| Role mySwitchRole = h.sw.getRole(); |
| if (mySwitchRole == Role.MASTER) { |
| log.info("Switch-driver sub-handshake complete. " |
| + "Activating switch {} with Role: MASTER", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h); //before activation |
| boolean success = h.controller.addActivatedMasterSwitch( |
| h.sw.getId(), h.sw); |
| if (!success) { |
| disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| return; |
| } |
| h.setState(MASTER); |
| } else { |
| log.info("Switch-driver sub-handshake complete. " |
| + "Activating switch {} with Role: EQUAL", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h); //before activation |
| boolean success = h.controller.addActivatedEqualSwitch( |
| h.sw.getId(), h.sw); |
| if (!success) { |
| disconnectDuplicate(h); |
| return; |
| } |
| h.setState(EQUAL); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| h.pendingPortStatusMsg.add(m); |
| } |
| }, |
| |
| |
| /** |
| * This controller is in MASTER role for this switch. We enter this state |
| * after requesting and winning control from the global registry. |
| * The main handshake as well as the switch-driver sub-handshake |
| * is complete at this point. |
| * // XXX S reconsider below |
| * In the (near) future we may deterministically assign controllers to |
| * switches at startup. |
| * We only leave this state if the switch disconnects or |
| * if we send a role request for SLAVE /and/ receive the role reply for |
| * SLAVE. |
| */ |
| MASTER(true) { |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "WARN", |
| message = "Received permission error from switch {} while" |
| + "being master. Reasserting master role.", |
| explanation = "The switch has denied an operation likely " |
| + "indicating inconsistent controller roles", |
| recommendation = "This situation can occurs transiently during role" |
| + " changes. If, however, the condition persists or happens" |
| + " frequently this indicates a role inconsistency. " |
| + LogMessageDoc.CHECK_CONTROLLER) |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| // first check if the error msg is in response to a role-request message |
| RoleRecvStatus rrstatus = h.roleChanger.deliverError(m); |
| if (rrstatus != RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION) { |
| // rolechanger has handled the error message - we are done |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // if we get here, then the error message is for something else |
| if (m.getErrType() == OFErrorType.BAD_REQUEST && |
| ((OFBadRequestErrorMsg) m).getCode() == |
| OFBadRequestCode.EPERM) { |
| // We are the master controller and the switch returned |
| // a permission error. This is a likely indicator that |
| // the switch thinks we are slave. Reassert our |
| // role |
| // FIXME: this could be really bad during role transitions |
| // if two controllers are master (even if its only for |
| // a brief period). We might need to see if these errors |
| // persist before we reassert |
| h.counters.epermErrorWhileSwitchIsMaster.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| log.warn("Received permission error from switch {} while" + |
| "being master. Reasserting master role.", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| //h.controller.reassertRole(h, Role.MASTER); |
| // XXX S reassert in role changer or reconsider if all this |
| // stuff is really needed |
| } else if (m.getErrType() == OFErrorType.FLOW_MOD_FAILED && |
| ((OFFlowModFailedErrorMsg) m).getCode() == |
| OFFlowModFailedCode.ALL_TABLES_FULL) { |
| h.sw.setTableFull(true); |
| } else { |
| logError(h, m); |
| } |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFStatsReply m) { |
| h.sw.deliverStatisticsReply(m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFExperimenter(OFChannelHandler h, OFExperimenter m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| Role role = extractNiciraRoleReply(h, m); |
| if (role == null) { |
| // The message wasn't really a Nicira role reply. We just |
| // dispatch it to the OFMessage listeners in this case. |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply( |
| new RoleReplyInfo(role, null, m.getXid())); |
| if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| checkAndSetRoleTransition(h, role); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFRoleReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException, IOException { |
| RoleReplyInfo rri = extractOFRoleReply(h, m); |
| RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| checkAndSetRoleTransition(h, rri.getRole()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| handlePortStatusMessage(h, m, true); |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPacketIn(OFChannelHandler h, OFPacketIn m) |
| throws IOException { |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFFlowRemoved(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFFlowRemoved m) throws IOException { |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFBarrierReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFBarrierReply m) |
| throws IOException { |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| } |
| |
| }, |
| |
| /** |
| * This controller is in EQUAL role for this switch. We enter this state |
| * after some /other/ controller instance wins mastership-role over this |
| * switch. The EQUAL role can be considered the same as the SLAVE role |
| * if this controller does NOT send commands or packets to the switch. |
| * This should always be true for OF1.0 switches. XXX S need to enforce. |
| * |
| * For OF1.3 switches, choosing this state as EQUAL instead of SLAVE, |
| * gives us the flexibility that if an app wants to send commands/packets |
| * to switches, it can, even thought it is running on a controller instance |
| * that is not in a MASTER role for this switch. Of course, it is the job |
| * of the app to ensure that commands/packets sent by this (EQUAL) controller |
| * instance does not clash/conflict with commands/packets sent by the MASTER |
| * controller for this switch. Neither the controller instances, nor the |
| * switch provides any kind of resolution mechanism should conflicts occur. |
| */ |
| EQUAL(true) { |
| @Override |
| void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| // role changer will ignore the error if it isn't for it |
| RoleRecvStatus rrstatus = h.roleChanger.deliverError(m); |
| if (rrstatus == RoleRecvStatus.OTHER_EXPECTATION) { |
| logError(h, m); |
| h.dispatchMessage(m); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFStatsReply m) { |
| h.sw.deliverStatisticsReply(m); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFExperimenter(OFChannelHandler h, OFExperimenter m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| Role role = extractNiciraRoleReply(h, m); |
| // If role == null it means the message wasn't really a |
| // Nicira role reply. We ignore it in this state. |
| if (role != null) { |
| RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply( |
| new RoleReplyInfo(role, null, m.getXid())); |
| if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| checkAndSetRoleTransition(h, role); |
| } |
| } else { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFRoleReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException, IOException { |
| RoleReplyInfo rri = extractOFRoleReply(h, m); |
| RoleRecvStatus rrs = h.roleChanger.deliverRoleReply(rri); |
| if (rrs == RoleRecvStatus.MATCHED_SET_ROLE) { |
| checkAndSetRoleTransition(h, rri.getRole()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // XXX S needs more handlers for 1.3 switches in equal role |
| |
| @Override |
| void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| handlePortStatusMessage(h, m, true); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "WARN", |
| message = "Received PacketIn from switch {} while " |
| + "being slave. Reasserting slave role.", |
| explanation = "The switch has receive a PacketIn despite being " |
| + "in slave role indicating inconsistent controller roles", |
| recommendation = "This situation can occurs transiently during role" |
| + " changes. If, however, the condition persists or happens" |
| + " frequently this indicates a role inconsistency. " |
| + LogMessageDoc.CHECK_CONTROLLER) |
| void processOFPacketIn(OFChannelHandler h, OFPacketIn m) throws IOException { |
| // we don't expect packetIn while slave, reassert we are slave |
| h.counters.packetInWhileSwitchIsSlave.updateCounterNoFlush(); |
| log.warn("Received PacketIn from switch {} while" + |
| "being slave. Reasserting slave role.", h.sw); |
| //h.controller.reassertRole(h, Role.SLAVE); |
| // XXX reassert in role changer |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| private final boolean handshakeComplete; |
| ChannelState(boolean handshakeComplete) { |
| this.handshakeComplete = handshakeComplete; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Is this a state in which the handshake has completed? |
| * @return true if the handshake is complete |
| */ |
| public boolean isHandshakeComplete() { |
| return handshakeComplete; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Get a string specifying the switch connection, state, and |
| * message received. To be used as message for SwitchStateException |
| * or log messages |
| * @param h The channel handler (to get switch information_ |
| * @param m The OFMessage that has just been received |
| * @param details A string giving more details about the exact nature |
| * of the problem. |
| * @return |
| */ |
| // needs to be protected because enum members are actually subclasses |
| protected String getSwitchStateMessage(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFMessage m, |
| String details) { |
| return String.format("Switch: [%s], State: [%s], received: [%s]" |
| + ", details: %s", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString(), |
| this.toString(), |
| m.getType().toString(), |
| details); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * We have an OFMessage we didn't expect given the current state and |
| * we want to treat this as an error. |
| * We currently throw an exception that will terminate the connection |
| * However, we could be more forgiving |
| * @param h the channel handler that received the message |
| * @param m the message |
| * @throws SwitchStateException |
| * @throws SwitchStateExeption we always through the execption |
| */ |
| // needs to be protected because enum members are acutally subclasses |
| protected void illegalMessageReceived(OFChannelHandler h, OFMessage m) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| String msg = getSwitchStateMessage(h, m, |
| "Switch should never send this message in the current state"); |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * We have an OFMessage we didn't expect given the current state and |
| * we want to ignore the message. |
| * @param h the channel handler the received the message |
| * @param m the message |
| */ |
| protected void unhandledMessageReceived(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFMessage m) { |
| h.counters.unhandledMessage.updateCounterNoFlush(); |
| if (log.isDebugEnabled()) { |
| String msg = getSwitchStateMessage(h, m, |
| "Ignoring unexpected message"); |
| log.debug(msg); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Log an OpenFlow error message from a switch. |
| * @param sw The switch that sent the error |
| * @param error The error message |
| */ |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Error {error type} {error code} from {switch} " |
| + "in state {state}", |
| explanation = "The switch responded with an unexpected error" |
| + "to an OpenFlow message from the controller", |
| recommendation = "This could indicate improper network operation. " |
| + "If the problem persists restarting the switch and " |
| + "controller may help." |
| ) |
| protected void logError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg error) { |
| log.error("{} from switch {} in state {}", |
| new Object[] { |
| error, |
| h.getSwitchInfoString(), |
| this.toString()}); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Log an OpenFlow error message from a switch and disconnect the |
| * channel. |
| * |
| * @param h the IO channel for this switch. |
| * @param error The error message |
| */ |
| protected void logErrorDisconnect(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg error) { |
| logError(h, error); |
| h.channel.disconnect(); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * log an error message for a duplicate dpid and disconnect this channel. |
| * @param h the IO channel for this switch. |
| */ |
| protected void disconnectDuplicate(OFChannelHandler h) { |
| log.error("Duplicated dpid or incompleted cleanup - " |
| + "disconnecting channel {}", h.getSwitchInfoString()); |
| h.duplicateDpidFound = Boolean.TRUE; |
| h.channel.disconnect(); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Extract the role from an OFVendor message. |
| * |
| * Extract the role from an OFVendor message if the message is a |
| * Nicira role reply. Otherwise return null. |
| * |
| * @param h The channel handler receiving the message |
| * @param vendorMessage The vendor message to parse. |
| * @return The role in the message if the message is a Nicira role |
| * reply, null otherwise. |
| * @throws SwitchStateException If the message is a Nicira role reply |
| * but the numeric role value is unknown. |
| */ |
| protected Role extractNiciraRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFExperimenter experimenterMsg) throws SwitchStateException { |
| int vendor = (int) experimenterMsg.getExperimenter(); |
| if (vendor != 0x2320) { |
| return null; |
| } |
| OFNiciraControllerRoleReply nrr = |
| (OFNiciraControllerRoleReply) experimenterMsg; |
| |
| Role role = null; |
| OFNiciraControllerRole ncr = nrr.getRole(); |
| switch(ncr) { |
| case ROLE_MASTER: |
| role = Role.MASTER; |
| break; |
| case ROLE_OTHER: |
| role = Role.EQUAL; |
| break; |
| case ROLE_SLAVE: |
| role = Role.SLAVE; |
| break; |
| default: //handled below |
| } |
| |
| if (role == null) { |
| String msg = String.format("Switch: [%s], State: [%s], " |
| + "received NX_ROLE_REPLY with invalid role " |
| + "value %s", |
| h.getSwitchInfoString(), |
| this.toString(), |
| nrr.getRole()); |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| } |
| return role; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Helper class returns role reply information in the format understood |
| * by the controller. |
| */ |
| protected static class RoleReplyInfo { |
| private Role role; |
| private U64 genId; |
| private long xid; |
| |
| RoleReplyInfo(Role role, U64 genId, long xid) { |
| this.role = role; |
| this.genId = genId; |
| this.xid = xid; |
| } |
| public Role getRole() { return role; } |
| public U64 getGenId() { return genId; } |
| public long getXid() { return xid; } |
| @Override |
| public String toString() { |
| return "[Role:" + role + " GenId:" + genId + " Xid:" + xid + "]"; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Extract the role information from an OF1.3 Role Reply Message. |
| * @param h |
| * @param rrmsg |
| * @return RoleReplyInfo object |
| * @throws SwitchStateException |
| */ |
| protected RoleReplyInfo extractOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFRoleReply rrmsg) throws SwitchStateException { |
| OFControllerRole cr = rrmsg.getRole(); |
| Role role = null; |
| switch(cr) { |
| case ROLE_EQUAL: |
| role = Role.EQUAL; |
| break; |
| case ROLE_MASTER: |
| role = Role.MASTER; |
| break; |
| case ROLE_SLAVE: |
| role = Role.SLAVE; |
| break; |
| case ROLE_NOCHANGE: // switch should send current role |
| default: |
| String msg = String.format("Unknown controller role %s " |
| + "received from switch %s", cr, h.sw); |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| } |
| |
| return new RoleReplyInfo(role, rrmsg.getGenerationId(), rrmsg.getXid()); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Handles all pending port status messages before a switch is declared |
| * activated in MASTER or EQUAL role. Note that since this handling |
| * precedes the activation (and therefore notification to IOFSwitchListerners) |
| * the changes to ports will already be visible once the switch is |
| * activated. As a result, no notifications are sent out for these |
| * pending portStatus messages. |
| * @param h |
| * @throws SwitchStateException |
| */ |
| protected void handlePendingPortStatusMessages(OFChannelHandler h) { |
| try { |
| handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h, 0); |
| } catch (SwitchStateException e) { |
| log.error(e.getMessage()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| private void handlePendingPortStatusMessages(OFChannelHandler h, int index) |
| throws SwitchStateException { |
| if (h.sw == null) { |
| String msg = "State machine error: switch is null. Should never " + |
| "happen"; |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| } |
| ArrayList<OFPortStatus> temp = new ArrayList<OFPortStatus>(); |
| for (OFPortStatus ps: h.pendingPortStatusMsg) { |
| temp.add(ps); |
| handlePortStatusMessage(h, ps, false); |
| } |
| temp.clear(); |
| // expensive but ok - we don't expect too many port-status messages |
| // note that we cannot use clear(), because of the reasons below |
| h.pendingPortStatusMsg.removeAll(temp); |
| // the iterator above takes a snapshot of the list - so while we were |
| // dealing with the pending port-status messages, we could have received |
| // newer ones. Handle them recursively, but break the recursion after |
| // five steps to avoid an attack. |
| if (!h.pendingPortStatusMsg.isEmpty() && ++index < 5) { |
| handlePendingPortStatusMessages(h, index); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Handle a port status message. |
| * |
| * Handle a port status message by updating the port maps in the |
| * IOFSwitch instance and notifying Controller about the change so |
| * it can dispatch a switch update. |
| * |
| * @param h The OFChannelHhandler that received the message |
| * @param m The PortStatus message we received |
| * @param doNotify if true switch port changed events will be |
| * dispatched |
| * @throws SwitchStateException |
| * |
| */ |
| protected void handlePortStatusMessage(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m, |
| boolean doNotify) throws SwitchStateException { |
| if (h.sw == null) { |
| String msg = getSwitchStateMessage(h, m, |
| "State machine error: switch is null. Should never " + |
| "happen"); |
| throw new SwitchStateException(msg); |
| } |
| |
| Collection<PortChangeEvent> changes = h.sw.processOFPortStatus(m); |
| if (doNotify) { |
| for (PortChangeEvent ev: changes) { |
| h.controller.notifyPortChanged(h.sw.getId(), ev.port, ev.type); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Checks if the role received (from the role-reply msg) is different |
| * from the existing role in the IOFSwitch object for this controller. |
| * If so, it transitions the controller to the new role. Note that |
| * the caller should have already verified that the role-reply msg |
| * received was in response to a role-request msg sent out by this |
| * controller after hearing from the registry service. |
| * |
| * @param h the ChannelHandler that received the message |
| * @param role the role in the recieved role reply message |
| */ |
| protected void checkAndSetRoleTransition(OFChannelHandler h, Role role) { |
| // we received a role-reply in response to a role message |
| // sent after hearing from the registry service. It is |
| // possible that the role of this controller instance for |
| // this switch has changed: |
| // for 1.0 switch: from MASTER to SLAVE |
| // for 1.3 switch: from MASTER to EQUAL |
| if ((h.sw.getRole() == Role.MASTER && role == Role.SLAVE) || |
| (h.sw.getRole() == Role.MASTER && role == Role.EQUAL)) { |
| // the mastership has changed |
| h.sw.setRole(role); |
| h.setState(EQUAL); |
| h.controller.transitionToEqualSwitch(h.sw.getId()); |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // or for both 1.0 and 1.3 switches from EQUAL to MASTER. |
| // note that for 1.0, even though we mean SLAVE, |
| // internally we call the role EQUAL. |
| if (h.sw.getRole() == Role.EQUAL && role == Role.MASTER) { |
| // the mastership has changed |
| h.sw.setRole(role); |
| h.setState(MASTER); |
| h.controller.transitionToMasterSwitch(h.sw.getId()); |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Process an OF message received on the channel and |
| * update state accordingly. |
| * |
| * The main "event" of the state machine. Process the received message, |
| * send follow up message if required and update state if required. |
| * |
| * Switches on the message type and calls more specific event handlers |
| * for each individual OF message type. If we receive a message that |
| * is supposed to be sent from a controller to a switch we throw |
| * a SwitchStateExeption. |
| * |
| * The more specific handlers can also throw SwitchStateExceptions |
| * |
| * @param h The OFChannelHandler that received the message |
| * @param m The message we received. |
| * @throws SwitchStateException |
| * @throws IOException |
| */ |
| void processOFMessage(OFChannelHandler h, OFMessage m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| h.roleChanger.checkTimeout(); |
| switch(m.getType()) { |
| case HELLO: |
| processOFHello(h, (OFHello) m); |
| break; |
| case BARRIER_REPLY: |
| processOFBarrierReply(h, (OFBarrierReply) m); |
| break; |
| case ECHO_REPLY: |
| processOFEchoReply(h, (OFEchoReply) m); |
| break; |
| case ECHO_REQUEST: |
| processOFEchoRequest(h, (OFEchoRequest) m); |
| break; |
| case ERROR: |
| processOFError(h, (OFErrorMsg) m); |
| break; |
| case FEATURES_REPLY: |
| processOFFeaturesReply(h, (OFFeaturesReply) m); |
| break; |
| case FLOW_REMOVED: |
| processOFFlowRemoved(h, (OFFlowRemoved) m); |
| break; |
| case GET_CONFIG_REPLY: |
| processOFGetConfigReply(h, (OFGetConfigReply) m); |
| break; |
| case PACKET_IN: |
| processOFPacketIn(h, (OFPacketIn) m); |
| break; |
| case PORT_STATUS: |
| processOFPortStatus(h, (OFPortStatus) m); |
| break; |
| case QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY: |
| processOFQueueGetConfigReply(h, (OFQueueGetConfigReply) m); |
| break; |
| case STATS_REPLY: // multipart_reply in 1.3 |
| processOFStatisticsReply(h, (OFStatsReply) m); |
| break; |
| case EXPERIMENTER: |
| processOFExperimenter(h, (OFExperimenter) m); |
| break; |
| case ROLE_REPLY: |
| processOFRoleReply(h, (OFRoleReply) m); |
| break; |
| case GET_ASYNC_REPLY: |
| processOFGetAsyncReply(h, (OFAsyncGetReply) m); |
| break; |
| |
| // The following messages are sent to switches. The controller |
| // should never receive them |
| case SET_CONFIG: |
| case GET_CONFIG_REQUEST: |
| case PACKET_OUT: |
| case PORT_MOD: |
| case QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REQUEST: |
| case BARRIER_REQUEST: |
| case STATS_REQUEST: // multipart request in 1.3 |
| case FEATURES_REQUEST: |
| case FLOW_MOD: |
| case GROUP_MOD: |
| case TABLE_MOD: |
| case GET_ASYNC_REQUEST: |
| case SET_ASYNC: |
| case METER_MOD: |
| default: |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| break; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /*----------------------------------------------------------------- |
| * Default implementation for message handlers in any state. |
| * |
| * Individual states must override these if they want a behavior |
| * that differs from the default. |
| * |
| * In general, these handlers simply ignore the message and do |
| * nothing. |
| * |
| * There are some exceptions though, since some messages really |
| * are handled the same way in every state (e.g., ECHO_REQUST) or |
| * that are only valid in a single state (e.g., HELLO, GET_CONFIG_REPLY |
| -----------------------------------------------------------------*/ |
| |
| void processOFHello(OFChannelHandler h, OFHello m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| // we only expect hello in the WAIT_HELLO state |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFBarrierReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFBarrierReply m) |
| throws IOException { |
| // Silently ignore. |
| } |
| |
| void processOFEchoRequest(OFChannelHandler h, OFEchoRequest m) |
| throws IOException { |
| if (h.ofVersion == null) { |
| log.error("No OF version set for {}. Not sending Echo REPLY", |
| h.channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| return; |
| } |
| OFFactory factory = (h.ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_13) ? |
| h.controller.getOFMessageFactory13() : h.controller.getOFMessageFactory10(); |
| OFEchoReply reply = factory |
| .buildEchoReply() |
| .setXid(m.getXid()) |
| .setData(m.getData()) |
| .build(); |
| h.channel.write(Collections.singletonList(reply)); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFEchoReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFEchoReply m) |
| throws IOException { |
| // Do nothing with EchoReplies !! |
| } |
| |
| // no default implementation for OFError |
| // every state must override it |
| abstract void processOFError(OFChannelHandler h, OFErrorMsg m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException; |
| |
| |
| void processOFFeaturesReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFFeaturesReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFFlowRemoved(OFChannelHandler h, OFFlowRemoved m) |
| throws IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFGetConfigReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFGetConfigReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| // we only expect config replies in the WAIT_CONFIG_REPLY state |
| illegalMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFPacketIn(OFChannelHandler h, OFPacketIn m) |
| throws IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| // no default implementation. Every state needs to handle it. |
| abstract void processOFPortStatus(OFChannelHandler h, OFPortStatus m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException; |
| |
| void processOFQueueGetConfigReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFQueueGetConfigReply m) |
| throws IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFStatisticsReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFStatsReply m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFExperimenter(OFChannelHandler h, OFExperimenter m) |
| throws IOException, SwitchStateException { |
| // TODO: it might make sense to parse the vendor message here |
| // into the known vendor messages we support and then call more |
| // specific event handlers |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFRoleReply(OFChannelHandler h, OFRoleReply m) |
| throws SwitchStateException, IOException { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void processOFGetAsyncReply(OFChannelHandler h, |
| OFAsyncGetReply m) { |
| unhandledMessageReceived(h, m); |
| } |
| |
| void handleUnsentRoleMessage(OFChannelHandler h, Role role, |
| RoleRecvStatus expectation) throws IOException { |
| // do nothing in most states |
| } |
| } |
| |
| |
| |
| //************************* |
| // Channel handler methods |
| //************************* |
| |
| @Override |
| @LogMessageDoc(message = "New switch connection from {ip address}", |
| explanation = "A new switch has connected from the " |
| + "specified IP address") |
| public void channelConnected(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, |
| ChannelStateEvent e) throws Exception { |
| counters.switchConnected.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| channel = e.getChannel(); |
| log.info("New switch connection from {}", |
| channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| sendHandshakeHelloMessage(); |
| setState(ChannelState.WAIT_HELLO); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| @LogMessageDoc(message = "Disconnected switch {switch information}", |
| explanation = "The specified switch has disconnected.") |
| public void channelDisconnected(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, |
| ChannelStateEvent e) throws Exception { |
| log.info("Switch disconnected callback for sw:{}. Cleaning up ...", |
| getSwitchInfoString()); |
| if (thisdpid != 0) { |
| if (!duplicateDpidFound) { |
| // if the disconnected switch (on this ChannelHandler) |
| // was not one with a duplicate-dpid, it is safe to remove all |
| // state for it at the controller. Notice that if the disconnected |
| // switch was a duplicate-dpid, calling the method below would clear |
| // all state for the original switch (with the same dpid), |
| // which we obviously don't want. |
| controller.removeConnectedSwitch(thisdpid); |
| } else { |
| // A duplicate was disconnected on this ChannelHandler, |
| // this is the same switch reconnecting, but the original state was |
| // not cleaned up - XXX check liveness of original ChannelHandler |
| duplicateDpidFound = Boolean.FALSE; |
| } |
| } else { |
| log.warn("no dpid in channelHandler registered for " |
| + "disconnected switch {}", getSwitchInfoString()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| @LogMessageDocs({ |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Disconnecting switch {switch} due to read timeout", |
| explanation = "The connected switch has failed to send any " |
| + "messages or respond to echo requests", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_SWITCH), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Disconnecting switch {switch}: failed to " |
| + "complete handshake", |
| explanation = "The switch did not respond correctly " |
| + "to handshake messages", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_SWITCH), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Disconnecting switch {switch} due to IO Error: {}", |
| explanation = "There was an error communicating with the switch", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_SWITCH), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Disconnecting switch {switch} due to switch " |
| + "state error: {error}", |
| explanation = "The switch sent an unexpected message", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_SWITCH), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Disconnecting switch {switch} due to " |
| + "message parse failure", |
| explanation = "Could not parse a message from the switch", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_SWITCH), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Terminating controller due to storage exception", |
| explanation = Controller.ERROR_DATABASE, |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_CONTROLLER), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Could not process message: queue full", |
| explanation = "OpenFlow messages are arriving faster than " |
| + "the controller can process them.", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.CHECK_CONTROLLER), |
| @LogMessageDoc(level = "ERROR", |
| message = "Error while processing message " |
| + "from switch {switch} {cause}", |
| explanation = "An error occurred processing the switch message", |
| recommendation = LogMessageDoc.GENERIC_ACTION) |
| }) |
| public void exceptionCaught(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, ExceptionEvent e) |
| throws Exception { |
| if (e.getCause() instanceof ReadTimeoutException) { |
| // switch timeout |
| log.error("Disconnecting switch {} due to read timeout", |
| getSwitchInfoString()); |
| counters.switchDisconnectReadTimeout.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| ctx.getChannel().close(); |
| } else if (e.getCause() instanceof HandshakeTimeoutException) { |
| log.error("Disconnecting switch {}: failed to complete handshake", |
| getSwitchInfoString()); |
| counters.switchDisconnectHandshakeTimeout.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| ctx.getChannel().close(); |
| } else if (e.getCause() instanceof ClosedChannelException) { |
| log.debug("Channel for sw {} already closed", getSwitchInfoString()); |
| } else if (e.getCause() instanceof IOException) { |
| log.error("Disconnecting switch {} due to IO Error: {}", |
| getSwitchInfoString(), e.getCause().getMessage()); |
| if (log.isDebugEnabled()) { |
| // still print stack trace if debug is enabled |
| log.debug("StackTrace for previous Exception: ", e.getCause()); |
| } |
| counters.switchDisconnectIOError.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| ctx.getChannel().close(); |
| } else if (e.getCause() instanceof SwitchStateException) { |
| log.error("Disconnecting switch {} due to switch state error: {}", |
| getSwitchInfoString(), e.getCause().getMessage()); |
| if (log.isDebugEnabled()) { |
| // still print stack trace if debug is enabled |
| log.debug("StackTrace for previous Exception: ", e.getCause()); |
| } |
| counters.switchDisconnectSwitchStateException.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| ctx.getChannel().close(); |
| } else if (e.getCause() instanceof OFParseError) { |
| log.error("Disconnecting switch " |
| + getSwitchInfoString() + |
| " due to message parse failure", |
| e.getCause()); |
| counters.switchDisconnectParseError.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| ctx.getChannel().close(); |
| } else if (e.getCause() instanceof RejectedExecutionException) { |
| log.warn("Could not process message: queue full"); |
| counters.rejectedExecutionException.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| } else { |
| log.error("Error while processing message from switch " |
| + getSwitchInfoString() |
| + "state " + this.state, e.getCause()); |
| counters.switchDisconnectOtherException.updateCounterWithFlush(); |
| ctx.getChannel().close(); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| public String toString() { |
| return getSwitchInfoString(); |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| public void channelIdle(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, IdleStateEvent e) |
| throws Exception { |
| OFFactory factory = (ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_13) ? factory13 : factory10; |
| OFMessage m = factory.buildEchoRequest().build(); |
| log.info("Sending Echo Request on idle channel: {}", |
| e.getChannel().getPipeline().getLast().toString()); |
| e.getChannel().write(Collections.singletonList(m)); |
| // XXX S some problems here -- echo request has no transaction id, and |
| // echo reply is not correlated to the echo request. |
| } |
| |
| @Override |
| public void messageReceived(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, MessageEvent e) |
| throws Exception { |
| if (e.getMessage() instanceof List) { |
| @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") |
| List<OFMessage> msglist = (List<OFMessage>) e.getMessage(); |
| |
| |
| for (OFMessage ofm : msglist) { |
| counters.messageReceived.updateCounterNoFlush(); |
| // Do the actual packet processing |
| state.processOFMessage(this, ofm); |
| } |
| } else { |
| counters.messageReceived.updateCounterNoFlush(); |
| state.processOFMessage(this, (OFMessage) e.getMessage()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| |
| |
| //************************* |
| // Channel utility methods |
| //************************* |
| |
| /** |
| * Is this a state in which the handshake has completed? |
| * @return true if the handshake is complete |
| */ |
| public boolean isHandshakeComplete() { |
| return this.state.isHandshakeComplete(); |
| } |
| |
| private void dispatchMessage(OFMessage m) throws IOException { |
| sw.handleMessage(m); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Return a string describing this switch based on the already available |
| * information (DPID and/or remote socket). |
| * @return |
| */ |
| private String getSwitchInfoString() { |
| if (sw != null) { |
| return sw.toString(); |
| } |
| String channelString; |
| if (channel == null || channel.getRemoteAddress() == null) { |
| channelString = "?"; |
| } else { |
| channelString = channel.getRemoteAddress().toString(); |
| } |
| String dpidString; |
| if (featuresReply == null) { |
| dpidString = "?"; |
| } else { |
| dpidString = featuresReply.getDatapathId().toString(); |
| } |
| return String.format("[%s DPID[%s]]", channelString, dpidString); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Update the channels state. Only called from the state machine. |
| * TODO: enforce restricted state transitions |
| * @param state |
| */ |
| private void setState(ChannelState state) { |
| this.state = state; |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Send hello message to the switch using the handshake transactions ids. |
| * @throws IOException |
| */ |
| private void sendHandshakeHelloMessage() throws IOException { |
| // The OF protocol requires us to start things off by sending the highest |
| // version of the protocol supported. |
| |
| // bitmap represents OF1.0 (ofp_version=0x01) and OF1.3 (ofp_version=0x04) |
| // see Sec. 7.5.1 of the OF1.3.4 spec |
| U32 bitmap = U32.ofRaw(0x00000012); |
| OFHelloElem hem = factory13.buildHelloElemVersionbitmap() |
| .setBitmaps(Collections.singletonList(bitmap)) |
| .build(); |
| OFMessage.Builder mb = factory13.buildHello() |
| .setXid(this.handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .setElements(Collections.singletonList(hem)); |
| log.info("Sending OF_13 Hello to {}", channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| channel.write(Collections.singletonList(mb.build())); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Send featuresRequest msg to the switch using the handshake transactions ids. |
| * @throws IOException |
| */ |
| private void sendHandshakeFeaturesRequestMessage() throws IOException { |
| OFFactory factory = (ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_13) ? factory13 : factory10; |
| OFMessage m = factory.buildFeaturesRequest() |
| .setXid(this.handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .build(); |
| channel.write(Collections.singletonList(m)); |
| } |
| |
| private void setSwitchRole(Role role) { |
| sw.setRole(role); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * Send the configuration requests to tell the switch we want full |
| * packets. |
| * @throws IOException |
| */ |
| private void sendHandshakeSetConfig() throws IOException { |
| OFFactory factory = (ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_13) ? factory13 : factory10; |
| //log.debug("Sending CONFIG_REQUEST to {}", channel.getRemoteAddress()); |
| List<OFMessage> msglist = new ArrayList<OFMessage>(3); |
| |
| // Ensure we receive the full packet via PacketIn |
| // FIXME: We don't set the reassembly flags. |
| OFSetConfig sc = factory |
| .buildSetConfig() |
| .setMissSendLen((short) 0xffff) |
| .setXid(this.handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .build(); |
| msglist.add(sc); |
| |
| // Barrier |
| OFBarrierRequest br = factory |
| .buildBarrierRequest() |
| .setXid(this.handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .build(); |
| msglist.add(br); |
| |
| // Verify (need barrier?) |
| OFGetConfigRequest gcr = factory |
| .buildGetConfigRequest() |
| .setXid(this.handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .build(); |
| msglist.add(gcr); |
| channel.write(msglist); |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * send a description state request. |
| * @throws IOException |
| */ |
| private void sendHandshakeDescriptionStatsRequest() throws IOException { |
| // Get Description to set switch-specific flags |
| OFFactory factory = (ofVersion == OFVersion.OF_13) ? factory13 : factory10; |
| OFDescStatsRequest dreq = factory |
| .buildDescStatsRequest() |
| .setXid(handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .build(); |
| channel.write(Collections.singletonList(dreq)); |
| } |
| |
| private void sendHandshakeOFPortDescRequest() throws IOException { |
| // Get port description for 1.3 switch |
| OFPortDescStatsRequest preq = factory13 |
| .buildPortDescStatsRequest() |
| .setXid(handshakeTransactionIds--) |
| .build(); |
| channel.write(Collections.singletonList(preq)); |
| } |
| |
| ChannelState getStateForTesting() { |
| return state; |
| } |
| |
| void useRoleChangerWithOtherTimeoutForTesting(long roleTimeoutMs) { |
| roleChanger = new RoleChanger(roleTimeoutMs); |
| } |
| |
| |
| } |